1990 vs 2009 Raiders Nike Air Trainer SC

Nike Air Trainer SC High OG 34 Bo Jackson

Yesterday, TheShoeGame broke the news about the 34 returning on the Bo Jackson Air Trainer SC High. As promised, here’s the 1990 vs 2009 Raiders Nike Air Trainer SC comparison.

First, check out the video which gives you a look at the 1990, 1997, and 2009 Raiders Air Trainer SC High. Check out the video!

As you saw in the video, there are several differences from the 1990 and 2009 version. The 1997 Raiders Air Trainer SC High is the closet version to the original make up (minus the 34). I personally would’ve have preferred Nike to re-release the 1997 version with or without the 34.

I’m well aware that most retro’s return with minor changes, but this retro is just off when compared to the originals. It’s going to take some getting use to seeing the “34″ on the back of the 2009 retro. Honestly, it feels good knowing you can rock a pair of wearable Bo Jackson’s with the 34 on the back. I just wish they were closer to the OG’s or 1997 retro, since the 09’s are obviously off. No matter how you look at it, the return of the 34 is a BIG deal. It’s like Jordan Brand bringing back the “Nike Air”.

In closing, I’d like to say in 1990 “Bo Knows”, but the 2009 retro equals “Bo No’s”. A nice shoe nonetheless, and it’s all about what YOU like. For the record, I got a pair of the 2009 retro’s (Thanks, Nike Lenox!) and I’m going to eventually wear them since both of my OG’s are only good for collectors items. At the end of the day, I was really really excited when I heard the 34 was coming back, but I was later disappointed when I laid eyes on the 2009 retro. I felt like a child on Christmas morning that didn’t get the gift they wanted. So sad, but true!

As stated before, the 2009 Raiders Air Trainer SC High 34 is now starting to arrive at Nike retailers. Retail, $105.

Check out the comparison images below:

Side by side, 1990 left and 2009 right

Nike Air Trainer SC 34 OG vs Retro

Nike Bo Jackson Air Trainer 34

Nike Air Trainer SC High 34

OG

Nike Air Trainer SC 34 OG

2009 retro

Nike Air Trainer SC 34 Retro

OG side panel

Nike Air Trainer SC High 34 OG Side

2009 retro side panel

Nike Air Trainer SC High 34 Retro Side

OG swoosh and netting

Nike Trainer SC 34 OG Net

2009 retro swoosh and net

Nike Air Trainer SC 34 Retro Net

OG

Nike Air Trainer SC High 34 OG

2009 retro

Nike Air Trainer SC High 34 Retro

OG vs 2009 retro toebox

Nike Air Trainer SC High 34 toebox

2009 retro (left) and 1990 OG (right)

Nike Air Trainer SC High 34 Tongue

Nike tag behind the tongue. 1990 version was made in Taiwan, and the 2009 retro was made in China.

Nike Air Trainer SC Tag

2009 retro (left) and 1990 OG (right)

Nike Air Trainer SC High 34 Back

1990, 1997, and 2009

Nike Air Trainer SC High Raiders Set

Bo Jackson Nike Trainer SC 34





Your Ad Here

49 Responses to “1990 vs 2009 Raiders Nike Air Trainer SC”

  1. This took wayyyyy longer than I expected. I hope everyone enjoys.

  2. 09 IS NO COMPARISON TO THE OG, QUALITY WISE….

  3. ^Exactly!

  4. Comment by MelloYelloMD October 14th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    Dang I can’t see the vid at work, but right off…these ARE a pretty weak facsimile of the OGs….no suede I could deal with…even the different “netting” but dang no recessed Nike on the tongue( is it 3m??)…no ankle mold?? WTF? Those are simple things to pick up from the OG. Either way I am still trying to cop but yea it’s like you said kinda disappointing. I remember asking you about these right before you dropped the news about them coming back….*sigh* lol

  5. ^Here’s the vimeo link Mello, I think it works at Home Depot.
    http://www.vimeo.com/7055564

  6. Comment by thatbehim October 14th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    The OG’s shit on the retros. It’s like MJ vs. Harold Miner. That suede/wrinkled leather is so sexy it’s not even funny. Might be MY personal favorite sneaker ever. So as much as the smooth leather pisses me off(it works much better with the white/orange/blue ones)I’ll probably buy them anyway which sadly is why Nike aint gonna change the bullshit they’re doing…spending less money to make more.

  7. I’m still getting a pair, but that tumbled leather is look oh so nice on the OG’s.

  8. Comment by hyestylekid October 14th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    Wow all this does is prove how the quality gets worst throughout the years i knew it was a difference in the og and the 2009 retro but man they really strayed away from it lol terrible terrible terrible but imma hypocrite i would still buy em and plan on buying nike better be lucky imma sucker for the shoes

  9. Comment by Converse King October 14th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    They definitely took some liberties with the retros. But that’s putting it lightly. Still, it’s not a bad shoe. I like how it looks.

  10. dat OG leather…
    thing of da past.

  11. I may still get a pair, but once again ain’t nothing like the OG’s.

  12. Comment by TC Da Heat Holder October 14th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Thx for the breakdown G-Roc! I had the the OG’s but I was not a Collector back then. Almost all of my O.G Heat from 80’s to about 2006 was stolen or ran into the ground! Retro’s have their place, I’m not going to try to replace everything at 300-2000 a pop! I like to wear my kicks, albeit some much less than others. With that said I will grab a pair no doubt!

  13. Comment by Blue cheese October 14th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    same quality

  14. Comment by MelloYelloMD October 14th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    Yea G that worked (how you know?)! G-Roc know dem Bo’s (said in my best Luda voice). On second sight, those 97s weren’t that bad even without the 34 (pebbled/tumbled leather, suede, etc…ahhh), but yea they are kinda disrespectful throwing the 34 on these joints…I would have rathered they put it on the Auburns and tried something new

  15. Comment by Marcg*sparklecity*sc October 14th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    A big difference in quality good comparison G-roc

  16. Comment by ATLien_Smoke October 14th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Man, they dont make shoes like they used to…

  17. OG way better

  18. Doesn’t feel good Nike… not at all.

  19. Comment by MisterMcFly23 October 14th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    like i said before, lets just be glad they arent a fusion or a hybrid…

  20. Comment by am95connoisseur aka 4daloveofdasneekz October 14th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    Thanks G-Roc….. I knew the differences all along…. like I said, show the young whipper snappers the differences but I am copping a pair immediately. It’s sad that the quality has fell off…… but I DON’T CARE… this is the closest I will get so I will take it. And I will take it NOW….. SZ 13 please

  21. ^No prob AM95C, these are also available at 21 Mercer.

  22. nice shirt g-roc got the same one

  23. ^Thanks, bra.

  24. Comment by Chevyboy October 14th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    I can still wear my ‘97 retros, but I still want a pair of these. I just have a thing for the 34, cuz I LOVE my ogz (both pair)! Chevyboy Knows! Thanks G-Roc.

  25. Went to Lennox today…THEY WERE REALLY GONE ASAP…smh

    Had to get the new 3gs instead!…YES SIR!!!!!!

  26. Comment by Chevyboy October 14th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    oh yeah…it looks like you’ve been wearing these around the house, G. Lol!

  27. Comment by Baby Jordan October 14th, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    It could be worse g-roc they couldve made em fusions lol

  28. Comment by am95connoisseur aka 4daloveofdasneekz October 14th, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    Yeah G-Roc… I know they’re at Mercer. I called today at 3… they had my sz… I get off of work at 4 to drive to NY and it was gone….. NO phone orders… I was mad as H.. E.. double hockey sticks but no worries. They will be on my feet within the week. LOL

  29. Might pick up, I need more nikes.

  30. Cant bet OG textures!!!!

  31. Great work G & TSG in comparing the OGs to the retros!

  32. The appeal of OG’s, to me at least, is the textured look that comes from the materials being beaten to death over a long time. So while these retro’s ARE for sure a different material, given time hitting the bricks in these in all kinds of weather, so the shoe can “break down,” a bit, they’ll start to take on that beautiful, aged look that makes it way easier to look down at a pair of 2009 retro’s and instantly make the connection to the older non-wearable OG’s……

  33. Comment by am95connoisseur aka 4daloveofdasneekz October 14th, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    PREACH IT TokyoMike…… LOL

  34. Comment by Serious October 14th, 2009 at 11:54 pm

    YO! G ROC can you give us an estimated time or a educated guess. When they are going to release those Nike Trainer Max 91′ Bo Jackson’s I’m looking forward to those joints. So any news you can get on them is good news. Hopefully Nike is going to be keeping Bo Jackson’s in rotation until they drop.

    Peace & freshness,

  35. I’m glad everyone enjoyed this piece I put together seeing that I was working on this allllll day. Mello, I knew the vimeo player would work at Home Depot. I own a few Home Depot’s, and I had them block YouTube players so people could actually get some work done. I haven’t mentioned vimeo in our meetings yet, but soon we’ll block them too. Enjoy vimeo while you can, lol.
    .
    Nice take, TM.
    .
    Chevyboy, you already KNOW what it is.
    .
    AM95C – I’ll know when you get your pair because pics will be uploaded to your TSG Community page. lol
    .
    MisterMcFly23 & Baby Jordan – lol, that’s so true.
    .
    Alex, did they say anything about getting more sizes?

  36. Serious – Are you talking about these?
    http://i36.tinypic.com/2hn55ll.jpg
    .
    If so, Nike dropped those a few years back.

  37. lmao tokyomike said it
    the ogs just have something the retros don’t have the most noticeable thing would be better quality but there is also that feel of old sneakers on your feet sure fresh looking kicks could never steer you wrong but Ogs are definitely not just an old pair of shoes

  38. Comment by willie mcfly22 October 15th, 2009 at 12:38 am

    few things on the OG i like better but a few things on the 09s i like better…stil an ok show cuz the price is very right…i’ll b on the look out so i can cop!

  39. Thanks G-Roc. I’m glad to see that you didn’t get rid of your OG 1990’s like I did. I’m glad that you captured the fiber straps on the side with the clear plastic over them as I mentioned yesterday. Man, I need to find those OG’s. I would like to have those to complete my Raider collection of Bo’s. Man, I remember it like my Freshman year. Thanks. Those pictures are refreshing. I almost thought that I was losing my mind.

  40. ^No problem, Sincere. I know these kicks are taking a lot of people back down memory lane. Here’s a song to go with all the nostalgia going on in here. Enjoy, Sincere and try not to cry. lol
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z7MaFE-uRQ

  41. Comment by walllyh October 15th, 2009 at 3:40 am

    good looks on the vid. as a recent owner of a pair of 97 retros, you just really get a whole new perspective on things. That 97 retro had some of the softest tumbled leather and suedes I have ever seen or felt. Then you compare to the NOW. You are dishonoring and straight up kicking Bo Jackson in the balls with this move. It’s nothing new though as mostly ALL 2004-2009 sc trainers have been terrible mediocre quality. The fun stopped in 2003 along with the great colors.. now the great colors are back, but the material degradation is as present as ever. Im all for nostaglia most of the time, but I would rather wear some beat up yellowed adidas no namers than to have those on my feet. They arent “Bo’s”. I’d rather wear no Bo’s than these fake Bo’s. peace

  42. Comment by gameface1326 October 15th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    Cheap chinese $hits

  43. what a comparison…wow

    alright G-ROC, you took the time for this video. take some time for that collection of yours. =)

  44. ^LOL, Jay. Thanks!

  45. Comment by trevdrake October 15th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    dammmmnnnn man shit the qaulity on the ogs it so much better i cant even pick the retros up after seeing this idk…

  46. Comment by Jerronimo October 15th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    NIIIIIIIICE job main! I still gotta grab a pair, even tho they’re not the same. I can’t pass it up! They be calling me like “Pooky” on “New Jack City”…lol

  47. Comment by Antseatown October 16th, 2009 at 1:30 am

    The video is borderline just say no to fakes honestly.

    The materials on the og’s are so on point and the “retros” are just a joke. Catch these on the $50 rack by xmas.

    AO

  48. Man, I got the sniffles. Lol! You should check me out. I have an online music store. Music is my first love, then these kicks!!! I deal with hard to find, rare and out of print Rap. It’s http://www.mintunderground.com. Thanks for the love.

  49. I remember the OG’s definitely my grail as they were the first “real” pair of kicks my mom bought me. Never forget them…if I only I could find a DS pair. The thing is back in 1990 when these came out they cost $130. Typically inflation comes into play but no one is willing to pay more than that for shoes ever. So they keep the same price point but the cost of leather has risen so they have to compromise the quality…sad. They should have just retro’d the originals and charge $250…definitely a pick up for me.

Leave a Reply (Watch Language)