GetSocial
GetSocial

Air Jordan 10 “Old Royal” – Closer Look

| February 1, 2012 | Comments (16)

The Air Jordan 10 “Old Royal” is the latest colorway to be added to the lineup. Here is a closer look at the Air Jordan 10 “Old Royal” colorway. The upper uses the same white tumbled leather as the “Chicago” colorway, but except this version will feature a white patent leather. Old Royal accents can be found throughout the outsole. inner liner, and tongue. The Air Jordan 10 Old Royal will hit Jordan Brand retailer such as Millennium Shoes on February 11th. The retail price will be $160.

02/11/2012 Air Jordan 10 Retro
487214-107 White/Old Royal-Stealth
$160.00 – Men’s
$70.00 – Grade School
$50.00 – Toddler
$42.00 – Infant

 

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Tags: , , , ,

Category: Air Jordan, Release Dates, Sneakerhead News

Comments (16)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. LA 2 Tha Bay says:

    Saw these in person the other day…and just like all recent retro Jordan’s…quality is AWFUL! Raised the price, lowered the qualtiy. Not falling for the “Ol’ Banana in The Tail Pipe Trick”.

  2. NickVitale says:

    No thanks.

  3. atgbryan says:

    more trash leather

  4. Foster says:

    Pass for me, but people need to stop bitching about the “quality” it’s either you like it or you don’t at the end of the day the same price it took to make the OGs is the same price their paying now to make the retros.

  5. 4DRUMZ says:

    Upon closer look… it STILL has patent where it shouldn’t… ever… have it! Plus, when that yellows… it’s just gonna look bad!

  6. Executive says:

    Lovin the colorway, bout that patent leather, $170 price tag and quality kills these for me. But these will sit in shelves so maybe I’ll scoop when the price takes a plunge.

  7. Damruff says:

    Can someone please tell me the difference between tumbled leather and creased leather?

  8. Jerronimo aka Seattle Slimm says:

    Eh!… They..I don’t know, look fake to me. JB really failed on these. Bring back the old AJ10 City series!!

  9. ant says:

    horrible

  10. Duke says:

    reading all these reviews has made me changing my mind

  11. ANother possible great shoe murdered because of patent leather RIP

  12. Shawty Black aka Dopeless Hope Fiend says:

    I’m actually straight on these.

  13. blind says:

    Would get them in a second if not for the patent leather….it worked with the 11s jb thats it….stop for all of us.

  14. etoranze says:

    guess that means ill be one of the few to purchase. i like em. i cant complain about quality i dont hoop in em. thats like complaining about a porche’ not being able to survive a crash. its not suppose to.

  15. T Double says:

    Yall lil cry babies don’t scoop em then. The patent leather go hard to me, which is why I’m knockin’ em off. I actually prefer it. But guess what? When I don’t like a pair I just don’t go buy em. Half the people whining about these shoes will be online paying 280$ for em because you didn’t wake up early enough to get em.

    Personally I think all the 10′s should have had the ’23′ emblem on the side, because it looks kinda plain without it, but I’ve seen far worse Jordans and colorways then this.

    Yall just bandwagon. Soon as a few comments run 1 way everybody hop on and start ridin right along wit it smh…

  16. T Double says:

    @ Duke

    You must be 9 years old. You decide if you want shoes by comments on a message board? SMH..

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.