Air Jordan 2009 – Black/Red/White

Air Jordan 2009 - Black/Red/White

After seeing the Air Jordan 2009 movie trailer style commercial Jordan heads now have respect for the new Air Jordan member. Not really, but the commercial was still dope. Anyone that watched the Jason Mayden Air Jordan 2009 interview can tell he poured a lot into the AJ2009. However, his passion for designing the AJ2009 wasn’t enough to change the minds of Jordan collectors according to our poll.

Perhaps the black, varsity red, and white Air Jordan 2009 might cause the AJ2009 haters to have a change of heart. How about the fact that this particular colorway is going to be a limited release? Still not feeling the AJ2009? Well, we don’t know what else to say. Sole-Locker didn’t provide a release, but the price is standing strong at $190 (ouch!).

Related News: Air Jordan 2009 Commercial

Air Jordan 2009 - Black/Red/White

Air Jordan 2009 - Black/Red/White

Air Jordan 2009 - Black/Red/White

Air Jordan 2009 - Black/Red/White

Air Jordan 2009 - Black/Red/White





Your Ad Here

36 Responses to “Air Jordan 2009 – Black/Red/White”

  1. looks like a shoe you can get at Costco

  2. nah walgreens

  3. things just went from bad to worse…straight up, that looks like a shiny football cleat!!

  4. for anybody thats gona cop…..
    would ya still cop if it didint have the jumpan logo??????
    how about if they where a general release?????

    my point is that these are some ugly ass shoes

  5. I like the black better than the white, but I still wouldnt pay over $100 for these. Also seems like the heel is too far off the ground and you would turn your ankle very easily, especially if someone playing against you is wearing the Kobe IV’s.

  6. nop pass! and way 2 much red,… lol

  7. riddle me this…seeing as that heel is split down the middle, what happens if one side wears down faster than the other?

  8. Comment by nikehead January 16th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    ^ i dont think it would be too much different than any other shoe regarding the heel thing. they do look a lot like cleats, and ya only about 1% of the shoe is red lol. maybe if they changed the white to red? or came out with a mostly red pair like the 21’s….but i think no matter how you cut it…the shoe still looks bad. I’m sure it performs great but not $190 great lol

  9. There is way to many kciks to even be thinking about these I’m good I don’t care what colorway they release.

  10. Comment by Air Jedi January 16th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    LOVE THE WHITE COLORWAY…NOT FEELING THIS…I WAS LOOKING TO SEE THIS COLORWAY BETTER….NOT COOPING THIS THE WHITE ONES 50/50 IF I CAN’T GET THE FOAM EGGPLANTS…GOOD POINT ETHER….I DON’T PLAY AGINST PEOPLE THAT WEAR KOBE 1V’S…..I LOVE MY ANKLES TOO MUCH

  11. Couldn’t sell these in a thrid world country….

    http://www.myspace.com/whiteBEATX

  12. get a Carolina colorway poppin off on it JB!

  13. These wouldn’t sell in a third world country… I’d trade em’ for some fourth meal… gotta have the large drink, though.

  14. Comment by ROC4LIFE January 16th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    You kno from now JB WILL STAND FOR Jus Bulls***…cause this is exactly what this shoe is…and these look like u can find them n chicks sporting good right next to some spalding slippers lool

  15. Comment by CenValCali January 16th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    ^ ROC4LIFE, thats cold. LMAO! Can’t nothin save these from it already bein a hot mess, but I would like to see a Bred CW, just food for thought….

  16. These look even worse then the white ones.
    No matter what color you throw on these, they will never be okay.

  17. The Pepe’ Le Pew series continues! Installment #3 joining the 1/22 CDP

  18. PAYLESS SHAQS

    hahaha on the real tho on court these are on point… but ONLY on court, anywhere else these are payless shaqs

  19. Saaaaaaaaaawwwwwiiiing….. and a miss!!!!

  20. these look like expensive ass iversons…i’ll cop once they hit the outlets ;)

  21. lol

    “Available at Sole-Locker a little early for $230.

    Release Date: 4/4/2009
    Model: Air Jordan 2009
    Color: Black/Varsity Red-White
    Product Code: 343084-062
    Price: $190

    $230!!!!

  22. Comment by de la SOLE January 17th, 2009 at 12:31 am

    They at least look like a good ballin shoe

  23. I think if they were suede they would look a little better, what do you think?

  24. one word: NO!

  25. I “like” the white ones better…..

  26. Comment by ROC4LIFE January 17th, 2009 at 4:11 am

    YALL REMEMBER WHEN KEVING GARNETT HAD A SHOW WIT AND 1 WIT THE ZIPPER THIS LOOKS JUUUUUUUS LIKE THEM JOINTS JB BITTTING HARD!!!!!

  27. Comment by Flatbush_Zone January 17th, 2009 at 7:58 am

    I DON’T THINK SO! BUT I KNOW IT WILL GROW ON SOME. AND THEY COULD’VE TOOKEN SOME PETTER PICS, FORGET THAT YELLOWISH BACKGROUND.

  28. If the toebox through the midsole was patent leather, or something crazy like snakeskin, then MAYBE.

  29. Comment by Acccord January 17th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    any they will still be standing on the shelves at that price…

  30. jordan brand going downhill yall

  31. Comment by irockjs14 January 18th, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    these are ugly to me.

  32. Comment by Retrosaurus Rex January 19th, 2009 at 5:37 am

    these made into fusions would be the best ones because i can imagine these without the high heel and a regular bottom/ i was going to buy these atfirst but these look horrible/ i turned down the 6rings and they are better looking than these. i wouldnt even consider disrespecting north carolina throwing carolina blue on this crap.
    UNITE US:kill yourself with that idea
    THAT BIG V ON THS SIDE IS HORRIBLE

  33. Comment by getlacedout.com January 19th, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    they should just stick with the white’s until further notice

  34. still a no

  35. Comment by JJ_DA KICKS KID January 21st, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    THESE LOOK UGLY…I WOULDENT BUY EM.

  36. All black would have looked better.

Leave a Reply (Watch Language)