GetSocial
GetSocial

Air Jordan 2010 (Sneak Peak)

| September 28, 2009 | Comments (70)

Air Jordan 2010

We’re sure better images of the Air Jordan 2010 will hit the web soon [*wink*], but until then, enjoy this sneak peak. That’s right people, you are looking at the Air Jordan 2010. Yeah, it’s not the best quality or shot, but at least you have some type of idea of what to expect. As you should know, the Air Jordan 2010 will hit Jordan Brand accounts next year. They will retail for $170. via Warped

Peep the Jordan 2′s in the background.

Jordan 2010

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Category: Air Jordan, News

Comments (70)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. MzNikeSB23 says:

    aha all i saw was straight up 2′s in the background idc about them 2010..

  2. gdiemaster says:

    Gross.

  3. Converse King says:

    I can’t tell how ugly it is or not from this picture. But it looks a hell of a lot better than the 2009′s. Damn those things are ugly though. I can tell you right away though. The material on this shoe looks weird to me. If the parts of the shoe that aren’t showing look the way I think they do, then this shoe will look a lot like the Converse 0100.

  4. AyyRrr says:

    2′s 2′s 2′s 2′s 2′s!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. Brandan E. says:

    yo, these J’s look pretty dope, they kinda pick up where the #23′s left off. last years pair sucked. that was the 1st AJ i didnt like. But these are dope! i likes!!

  6. TC Da Heat Holder says:

    Wake me when the 2′s drop!

  7. mike7 says:

    2222222222222222222222222222222222222222 ‘SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

  8. haux says:

    If was I was there….what would I pick up? 2010′s or 2′s? hmm hard decision, don’t you think?

  9. haux says:

    Converse King, those look like something converse would of made wade.

  10. Jamie from Philly. says:

    Just give us the 2′s. No care for 2010′s.

  11. RareAirs says:

    The 2010s look like K-Mart Protege shoes. .__. I gotta see ‘em in person.
    Couldn’t sneak any pics of the new Spiz’ikes, VIs, or AJKOs in the shot? Lol. I’m thankful for the Chi-Town IIs though. Summer 2010 is looking bad for my wallet and college savings fund.

  12. SOUTHERNPLAYALISTICNIKES says:

    o i would copp those 2s wat r u guyz talkin bout???????????????

  13. CHICITYK7 says:

    2′s look bulky in the background

  14. o.s.t says:

    Let’s see i’ll take the 2′s in the background,hold the 2010′s.thank u.

  15. stayflyer says:

    they rocable but they look like jumpmans

  16. JordanAmbassador4Life says:

    Somebody at JB needs to roll their ankle badly. I’m sick and tired of these Team Jordan lookalikes. I might have to take my business to Payless if they continue with these pieces of crap.

  17. jumpoldman36 says:

    Reminds me of the 16s… the Jordan Jumpman logo is too big on the side…

  18. kicksonmymind says:

    2′sssssssssss

  19. MelloYelloMD says:

    Yea forgot the 2010s I wants IIs!!!! The 2010s look like LeBrons or something

  20. charliesbs says:

    yee 2s ive been waiting that slam dunk pack is too tight… 2010 releases are gonna be be nice all the 6s that pair of 9s and hopefully some other heat thats gonna be tight

  21. Blue cheese says:

    I’ll take a sz. 12 in the 2′s

  22. Marcg*sparklecity*sc says:

    I need those 2′s bad in the background.but the 2010 looks like another failure

  23. 4DRUMZ says:

    Colossal flop 2 years in a row JB… way to go! The giant jumpman makes them look ridiculous. Material looks wacky! I like the profile of the shoe… but the toebox is a direct bite from the Soldier III. This is just getting silly… I thought there was some real effort being made for the 25th Jordan!?!?!?!

  24. CenValCali says:

    Wanna touch, smell, taste, hear, & look @ em up close b4 I make a sufficient answer….

  25. Danan says:

    A shoe legacy tarnished…

  26. Danan says:

    But I’ll try em out for free.

  27. Prolificstylez says:

    The pics are to shotty to made a conclusive opinion, but from the little bit I see I don’t think that the JB2k10 is a catastrophe (going on the little that I see,) it actually looks decent and would probably alot better with that over-enlarged airman symbol

  28. @iAMsamclonts says:

    Those are horrid!!! But the 2′s are glorious…Thx for the pics!!!!

  29. RareAirs says:

    It seems JB can’t please thse retro-crazed customers anymore. -.-

  30. Lo$w@rd g says:

    That pic made da 2′$ look weak!may is gon b my biggest month for js ever,leak some sample pics of da infrared spizike

  31. JMadd says:

    Since when do we put the jumpman on the side of the shoe I’m not feelin that everything else is cool

  32. dasone says:

    i knew mad people was gonna hate on these lol, im coppin reguaurdless, they look like they are made of the same materials the nike Lunar series are made of, and those are crazy light maybe they might introduce some flywire in to the MJ’s, not hatin on that at all as long as they make it look right like them lebron 7′s

  33. SOUTHERNHOSPITALITY says:

    PASS

  34. kyle says:

    G-roc do you have any news on the chicago 10s releasing next year haven’t seen u post anything about them yet

  35. G-Roc says:

    No I don’t kyle. I’m just waiting for the green light, so I can post some of JB’s Summer 2010 releases.

  36. am95connoisseur says:

    Will pass on both of them… sold my retro 2s sometime ago. 12s and 6s baby…. with a dash of space jams on the side and the comet and slate AM95s for desert,,,LOL

  37. MisterMcFly23 says:

    Prada should be mad as hell right now, because all that is is a Prada model with a jumpman all over it. way to let the world down, JB. dissapointed doesn’t even begin to explain how i feel about this P.O.S…

  38. neva2menyJs says:

    MAN BUTT UGLY SHOES AND THEY GANNA COST 170$ ??? WOW JB…..I SAY FOUCS ON THE RETROS AND FOR GET 2008 AND UP..UGLY JUST UGLY…..BUT ON THE OTHER HAND THEM 2S IN THE BACK O YEA BBY….ILL FIND THEM A GOOD HOME..

  39. Chevyboy says:

    I think JB oughta stick to retros, because this new ish ain’t cuttin it…IMO the 2009′s look WAY better than these. On the other hand, the 2s look true to OG form. Do we have a release date on those G-Roc?

  40. Chevyboy says:

    Oh yeah, JB—There IS such a thing as having too many details! Ya’ll are over-doing it…we like nice and subtle designs.

  41. ATLien_Smoke says:

    Those 2′s all day.. I dont even see no 2010 Jordan.. Wackness..

  42. T-Rav says:

    Just plain terrible. Here comes another flop.

  43. Tre.Brown says:

    WTF!!!..those are super ugly.. yea gimme them 2s…lol

  44. AirJedi says:

    They got something of the 13…i love the no holes for the laces….a jumpman on the tongue would look better than the 23.Love the traditional colorway…I am 50/50 need more pics….

  45. dirtydenims says:

    i know that change is necessary but can we get back to sneakers that at least hold some type of candle to the old models? his shoes look more and more generic as the years pass.

  46. KJ NC's FLYEST says:

    mann aint nobody worried bout dem damn 2010 shits……………….show dem beautiful 2′s n da bac!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  47. PrettyBoy says:

    Them shxts look like DWades .
    &nd is it just me or do those 2′s look like GS sizes ?

  48. XkrispyELI says:

    wow. i cant believe jb messed this one up again.

  49. tommaso says:

    o jesus

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.